Linux/Mac does have malware Linux aren't free unless you review all source & compile it yourself. Inclusind compiling compiler toolchain itself on a trusted open hardware. Builds should be reproducible.
All systems are vulnerable.
Write your own better OS.
>>6 it's a kult. you either a follower consumer, or an ios dev getting paid. >>21 if you are on a modern windows, you can get a lot of the benefits of Mac. By default I think it's unix-like but other distros are also possible to set up. It's not ideal, but it does work pretty well if you don't have a second pc, don't want to dual boot and generally works a bit better than windows hosting VM. many unix apps run natively, and sources compile without MinGW. >>22 bs >>25 yep. you right. >>26 linux have portable binaries. with static and dynamic linking. and source code tarballs : ./configure ; make ; make install . is that hard? if some moron ship bloat with fuckton dependencies - that's shitware. that's why people like minimalism.
Linux aren't free unless you review all source & compile it yourself. Inclusind compiling compiler toolchain itself on a trusted open hardware. Builds should be reproducible.
All systems are vulnerable.
Write your own better OS.
>>6
it's a kult. you either a follower consumer, or an ios dev getting paid.
>>21
if you are on a modern windows, you can get a lot of the benefits of Mac. By default I think it's unix-like but other distros are also possible to set up.
It's not ideal, but it does work pretty well if you don't have a second pc, don't want to dual boot and generally works a bit better than windows hosting VM.
many unix apps run natively, and sources compile without MinGW.
>>22
bs
>>25
yep. you right.
>>26
linux have portable binaries. with static and dynamic linking. and source code tarballs : ./configure ; make ; make install . is that hard?
if some moron ship bloat with fuckton dependencies - that's shitware.
that's why people like minimalism.