>>12 I find the idea that you are "meeting" the mangaka &c. ridiculous; it's performative, a performance, a play (at the level of bourgeois theatre). The mangaka at the convention is reduced to a social signifier, an open-ended signifier to be consumed without otherness (the final object of consumer culture is to always reduce everything to the same same-ness, i.e -> liberal universality); in fact, you'd do a better job of "meeting" a mangaka if you were to do a drive-by on them, because at least in this scenario you escape the constraints of exchange.
The enjoyment (in terms of _joy_ not entertainement) of a author's work, is a 10^6 better intercourse, than any convention (enjoyment in-as-much as one is a dividual projecting him-self into de liberal new-man aka individual).
>>11 The world is material, ergo, everything is materiality. Please take your fascism to another discursive Universe. Everything is intercourse, everything is meta-interest, nothing is enjoyed in it-self, but rather for something else, the isolation of the work into itself is correct in-as-much as there is no outside of the text, but incorrect in-as-much as our participation in text must be limited by text, this is to say, we must not allow how participation be limited by the given of text -- there must always be a giving, and therefore, the outside of the text penetrating violently (materially, and obscenely) into the the text "it-self".
I find the idea that you are "meeting" the mangaka &c. ridiculous; it's performative, a performance, a play (at the level of bourgeois theatre). The mangaka at the convention is reduced to a social signifier, an open-ended signifier to be consumed without otherness (the final object of consumer culture is to always reduce everything to the same same-ness, i.e -> liberal universality); in fact, you'd do a better job of "meeting" a mangaka if you were to do a drive-by on them, because at least in this scenario you escape the constraints of exchange.
The enjoyment (in terms of _joy_ not entertainement) of a author's work, is a 10^6 better intercourse, than any convention (enjoyment in-as-much as one is a dividual projecting him-self into de liberal new-man aka individual).
>>11
The world is material, ergo, everything is materiality. Please take your fascism to another discursive Universe. Everything is intercourse, everything is meta-interest, nothing is enjoyed in it-self, but rather for something else, the isolation of the work into itself is correct in-as-much as there is no outside of the text, but incorrect in-as-much as our participation in text must be limited by text, this is to say, we must not allow how participation be limited by the given of text -- there must always be a giving, and therefore, the outside of the text penetrating violently (materially, and obscenely) into the the text "it-self".
De-gozai-masu.